ISSN 2413-2322 (Online)

ISSN 2221-1055 (Print)

UDS: 338.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202011090
Аграрний менеджмент і підприємництво

Premises and prospects for organising and developing secondary and tertiary producers’ cooperatives in Ukraine: the case of dairy service cooperatives / Bezus R.M., Burtak S.H., Kriuchko L.S., Dubrova N.P. // Ekonomika APK. - 2020. - № 11 - P. 90

The purpose of the article is to identify the premises and prospects for organising and developing secondary and tertiary producers’ cooperatives in Ukraine, specifically for dairy service cooperatives. Research methods. The research uses dialectical methods of cognition and monographic method – for the analysis of works of Ukrainian and foreign scientists on the problem of agricultural dairy cooperation; empirical and graphical methods – to demonstrate the state of the cooperative movement in European countries and interactions between three levels of cooperatives; remote survey method – to find out the opinions of co-operators about secondary and tertiary cooperatives; abstract logical methods – for theoretical generalizations and formulation of conclusions. Research results. Most cooperators seek a collective solution to the problems of a competitive business environment in Ukraine. The functioning of cooperative unions, which include dairy cooperatives (secondary cooperatives), improved interaction between participants in the dairy business and contributed to better organization of agricultural production in rural communities. According to the respondents’ opinions, the tertiary cooperative is designed to support farmers and cooperatives in solving such significant problems as restrictive legislation, or to support in the process of such critical reforms for agricultural producers as land reform. Those organisations may be able to influence the market conditions, to raise the funding or subsidies for small-scale dairy farmers. Scientific novelty. This article identified the reasons for small-scale dairy farmers to cooperate and their opinions about premises and prospects for organising and developing secondary and tertiary farming cooperatives in Ukraine. It highlighted perspective points of development and improvement for such organizations to support the further functioning of the rural dairy business in Ukraine. In particular, the respondents of surveyed secondary cooperatives are aware of prospective benefits from cooperative unions and expect something similar from starting the tertiary cooperative. They prefer those to be organised based on sectoral mandate and mainly concentrated on legislation and funding matters, but 80% of respondents have doubts about practical realisation of this idea because of such risks as corruption and shadow economy matters. It is important to stress that secondary cooperatives are the business organizations and in the worldwide experience aiming at marketing, processing or trading the production, gaining the bargaining power and market share. Practical significance. Scientists and experts of the agricultural economy can use the results of the study to support the development of secondary and tertiary dairy service cooperatives for improving the working conditions in rural communities with cooperatives and business environment for small-scale dairy producers in Ukraine. Tabl.: 2. Figs.: 1. Refs.: 19.
Key words: agricultural cooperatives; dairy cooperatives; cooperative union; cooperative; secondary and tertiary cooperatives

References

  1. Amelina, Yu.S. (2016). Ekonomichnyi rozvytok silskohospodaskykh pidpryiemstv orhanichnoho ovochivnytstva ta plodivnytstva [Economic development of agrarian enterprises in organic olericulture and pomiculture]. Candidate’s thesis. Dnipropetrovsk: DSAEU [In Ukrainian].
  2. Bezus, R. & Burtak, S. (2018). Chomu kooperatyvy pomyraiut v Ukraini [Why coops die in Ukraine?]. Retrieved from: https://kurkul.com/spetsproekty/248-chomu-v-ukrayini-pomirayut-kooperativi kurkul.com [In Ukrainian].
  3. Vseukrainskyi ahrarnyi forum [All-Ukrainian Agrarian Forum]. (2020). Retrieved from: http://unaf.org.ua/ua/ [In Ukrainian].
  4. Zinovchuk, V.V. & Dovzhenko, V.A. (2017). Silskohospodarska kooperatsiia: problemy ta perspektyvy [Agricultural cooperation: problems and perspectives]. Ekonomika APK, 9, pp. 90-96. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/E_apk_2017_9_17 [In Ukrainian].
  5. Kilkist yurydychnykh osib za orhanizatsiino-pravovymy formamy hospodariuvannia. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy [Number of legal entities by organizational and legal forms of management]. (2020). Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/edrpoy/ukr/EDRPU_2020/ks_opfg/ks_opfg_0720.htm [In Ukrainian].
  6. Malik, M.Yo. (2010). Problemni pytannia rozvytku kooperatsii ta intehratsiinykh vidnosyn v APK [Problematic issues of cooperation and integration relations in the agro-industrial complex]. Ekonomika APK, 3, pp. 45-49 [In Ukrainian].
  7. Pro silskohospodarsku kooperatsiiu: Zakon Ukrainy # 819-IX vid 21 lypnia 2020 r. [On Agricultural Cooperation. Law of Ukraine No. 819-IX from July 21, 2020]. (2020). Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/819-20#Text [In Ukrainian].
  8. Struktura vyrobnytstva produktsii tvarynnytstva za vydamy vyrobnykiv [Structure of livestock production according to types of producers]. (2020). Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2020/zb/09/zb_sg_Ukr_2019.pdf [In Ukrainian].
  9. Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act (2014). London: UK Law. Retrieved from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/14/contents [In English].
  10. Fredrick, O. Wanyama (2009). Surviving liberalization: the cooperative movement in Kenya. Coop Africa, Working paper, 3, p. 9. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/---coop/documents/publication/wcms_117886.pdf [In English].
  11. Hoyt, A. (1989). Cooperatives in other countries. In Cooperatives in agriculture, pp. 81-97. D. Cobia (Ed.). New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc [In English].
  12. Ingalsbe, G. & Groves, F. (1989). Historical development. In Cooperatives in agriculture, pp. 106-120. D. Cobia (Ed.). New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc [In English].
  13. International Co-operative Alliance (2020). Cooperative identity Retrieved from: https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity [In English].
  14. Karakas, C. (2019). Cooperatives: characteristics, activities, status, challenges. European Parliamentary Research Service Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/635541/EPRS_BRI(2019)635541_EN.pdf [In English].
  15. Kwanzi, M. & Mbohva, C. (2017). Exploring the Secondary Co-operative Model in the Supply of Fabric to Primary Sewing Co-operatives. Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), Bristol, UK, July 24-25 [In English].
  16. Shpykuliak, O. & Sakovska, О. (2020). Agricultural cooperation as an innovation for rural development. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 6(3), pp. 183-189 [In English]. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-3-183-889.
  17. Srinivasan, S. & Sundaram, B. (2020). Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives to Endorse Socio-Economic Development in Ethiopia International Research Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 1 (3), pp. 199-205 [In English].
  18. Tarasov, D. (2014). Key aspects of service cooperatives in the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Retrieved from: http://old.bumib.edu.ua/sites/default/files/visnyk/stattya_tarasov_ang.doc [In English].
  19. Zinovchuk, V. (2007), Supporting agribusiness in Ukraine: Cooperatives and beyond. Retrieved from: http://vadyba.asu.lt/9/73.pdf [In English].
Read article: ekonomikaapk_2020_11_p_90_98.pdf